Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-211292

ABSTRACT

Background: Contraception was the way to prevent pregnancy, both temporarily and permanently. Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA) is a contraceptive injection of synthetic progesterone hormone and is injected every three months, which is most commonly used currently, but that emerging consequences of long time usage of contraception, especially the hormonal one, cannot be denied. This research was aimed to see difference in blood sugar, insulin and lipid profile in childbearing aged women who used DMPA injection and Non-Acceptors.Methods: The study was observational with the comparative cross sectional approach. Research was conducted in the Biomedical Laboratory in Andalas University and Regional Technical Service Unit (UPTD) Laboratory in West Sumatera Province. Data was taken from December 2017 until June 2018. The research sampled 48 DMPA acceptors and 48 non-Acceptors. Sampling technique used stratified random sampling. Examination of blood glucose was carried out by the enzymatic method of GOD-PAP, ELISA for insulin. Data were analyzed using independent T-test and if the data was not normal, non parametric Mann-Whitney test was used. The differences were considered statistically significant if the value of p<0.05.Results: The mean blood glucose acceptors 91.27mg/dl, non acceptors 88.83mg/dl and mean Insulin acceptors 23.63mIU/L, non akseptor 24.63mIU/L. The results showed that there were no significant differences between DMPA acceptors and non acceptors (p>0.05) in blood glucose (0.059) and insulin (p = 0.603).Conclusions: There were no significant differences in blood glucose and insulin levels between DMPA acceptors and non acceptors.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-211220

ABSTRACT

Background: A hormonal contraception which considered ideal is depot medroxy progesteron acetat. There are large number of acceptors choose this contraception because this contraception is considered safe, effective, and can be used after labor. The possible side effect which can occur are increase of lipid profile, body fat percentage, and waist circumference. The purpose of this study is to see the differences between lipid profile, body fat percentage, and the waist circumference of women of childbearing age who use depot medroxy progesteron acetat injection compared with non-acceptors.Methods: This study was observational study with a cross sectional comparative approach and was conducted at the Regional Technical Services Unit (UPTD) at Regional Health Laboratory in West Sumatera Province from December 2017 until June 2018. The samples were 46 DMPA acceptors and 46 non-acceptors. The sampling method used random sampling technique. The measurements of lipid profile was conducted with colorimetric enzymatic method, which is GPO-PAP for triglycerides, and CHOD-PAP for total cholesterol, HDL and LDL. The percentage of body fat examination was conducted using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). The obtained data were analyzed by using t-test. Abnormal data were confirmed by Mann-whitney non-parametric test with p<0.05.Results: The results showed a significant difference between DMPA acceptors and non-acceptors (p<0.05). In total cholesterol (p = 0.000), LDL (p = 0.000), triglycerides (p = 0.000), body fat percentage (p = 0.007), body mass index (p = 0.004), and waist circumference (p = 0.001). But, in HDL there was no significant difference between DMPA acceptors and non-acceptors with p value = 0.302 (p>0.05). There were significant differences in total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, fat percentage, body mass index, and the circumference of waist in both DMPA acceptors and non acceptors. There were no significant difference in HDL levels between DMPA acceptors and non acceptors.Conclusions: There were significant differences in total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, fat percentage, body mass index, and waist circumference between DMPA acceptors and non-acceptors. There was no significant difference in HDL between DMPA acceptors and non-acceptors.

3.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-211146

ABSTRACT

Background: Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside-class antibiotic that can lead to an increase in ROS and decrease antioxidant reserves that cause destruction of testicular cells that are known to inhibit cell division in testicular germ cells and protein synthesis in the testes as well as affect the production of testosterone that affects the quality of spermatogenesis. Vitamin C as an antioxidant can counteract ROS so that testicular cells can be repaired.Methods: This study was an experimental research with post tests only control group design on 25 male rats, 2-3 aged months, weight 160-240 g. Animals were divided into 5 groups. Negative control group was placed in cage without treatment, positive control given induced gentamicin 5mg/kgbb for the first 10 days, and 3 treatment given induced gentamicin 5mg/kgbb for the first 10 days and at days 11-51 were given vitamin C at a dose of 1.6mg; 2.25mg; 4.5mg. On 52 day, all of wistar rats perform terminated for analyzed the testosterone levels were by ELISA, sperm count was calculated with then haemocytometer observed with digital microscope, morphology of spermatozoa was analyzed by eosin staining and was observed with digital microscope.Results: Results of this study showed that the average of testosteron serum on control negatif group of 3,82ng/ml, control positif 3.73ng/ml, treatment 1 is 9.52ng/ml, treatment 2 is 8.29ng/ml, and traetment 3 is 2.28ng/ml. Sperm count on control negatif 41.68 million/ml, control positif 21.06million/ml, treatment 1 is 52.92 million/ml, treatment 2 is 57.12million/ml, treatment 3 is 80.88 million/ml and sperm morphology on control negative  74.00%, control positif 46.96%, treatment 1 is 58.82%, treatment 2 is 68.68%, and treatment 3 is 78.72%.Conclusions: It is concluded that vitamin C has significant effect on increasing testosteron level and sperm quality in gentamicin-induced wistar rats.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL